|
UT professor debunks chupacabra myth for Discovery Channel
By Justin Ward
The producers of "Mystery Hunters," an educational TV program for kids, asked Owen to help identify bones reported to belong to the mythical chupacabra. The chupacabra, whose name means goat-sucker in Spanish, is a fabled creature which attacks and mutilates live-stock, sucking the blood of its prey. The bones belong to rancher Devin Macanally who shot the animal while it was attacking chickens on his ranch in Elmendorf. Photos of the animal, which later became known as the "Elmendorf Beast" show a small, hairless, dog-like creature. Owen, who holds a doctorate in mammalogy with a specialization in carnivores, said that when she first heard about the "Elmendorf Beast," she agreed with biologists' initial findings that it was some kind of coyote with severe mange. Owen's suspicions were later confirmed when the show's producers e-mailed her a photo of the creature's exhumed skull. Owen, who has been identifying bones for the Texas Memorial Museum for six years, was able to recognize the skull almost instantly. "I wrote back and said, 'Nice coyote.'" she said. Owen said she could understand how an average person could mistake the creature for a new species. "What [Macanally] described was certainly not like any coyote," she said. "It was this hairless blue-skinned thing with disfigured teeth. This was a sick animal." What is called supernatural phenomena can often be explained within the context of a natural world, Owen said. "I still think the stories are great, but they are based on interesting natural phenomena," she said. The investigation of the "Elmendorf Beast" was only one part of the episode. The show's teenage investigators also went to Puerto Rico, where the chupacabra myth originated, said Stephen Lawson, a researcher for "Mystery Hunters." Owen said that she was glad to take part in the show, because it is a way to teach children about the scientific method. The program will air on Discovery Channel for Kids at the beginning of the fall season. The Texan strives to present all information fairly, accurately and completely.
If we have made an error, let us know about it here, or email managingeditor@dailytexanonline.com. |




Be sure to include your name, major, and classification. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.
By clicking Post, you give The Daily Texan the right to publish your comments in any form, including online and in print in The Firing Line. Please limit your comments to 300 words. The Daily Texan reserves the right to edit all comments for brevity, clarity and liability.
You may also send Firing Lines to the editor at firingline@dailytexanonline.com
Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 17
Anonymous
posted 6/16/06 @ 8:55 AM CST
My name is Charles Potnar. What's to be gained by trying to convince people that the "chupacabra" doesn't exist? Something weird is going on, with all the people claiming abductions, cattle mutilations, ufo sightings. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/16/06 @ 12:35 PM CST
Good one Doc! I am so tired of uneducated people assuming something is "mystical" because it is something "different".
Anonymous
posted 6/16/06 @ 1:01 PM CST
Who the hell said anything about "supernatural"? If the chupy is real, then it's an animal, not "supernatural". Ya gotta love the way debunkers try and shift the ground to suit themselves. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/16/06 @ 3:45 PM CST
chupacarbers is real ask my uncle dilbert one done bit him 5 times
Anonymous
posted 6/16/06 @ 4:25 PM CST
In room322--my literary website--I have a page with a complete Texas Mystery Animal archive, starting with Elmendorf in Aug of 04. You will need to scroll down: http://www. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/16/06 @ 8:33 PM CST
I might agree with her in the Elmendorf case, but in Puerto Rico does not exists any type of coyotes, foxes or wolfes. We do have some dogs left homeless, then again, they are not capable of making those punctures on the neck or living the chickens, goats or other animal without blood. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/16/06 @ 9:44 PM CST
Just because she proved that one piece of evidence is actually a coyote doesn't mean there's no such thing as the chupacabra.
What does she want a cookie? Good for you lady, so you know your bones. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/16/06 @ 10:07 PM CST
Why do they even try to say it exist or doesn't? Just this week on Headline news a rare rhino was supposedly spotted on a camera. We have very many elusive animals out there that are hidden, and if you add in any jungle, swamp, desert, etc(aka hard to track area) these animals will stay elusive. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/19/06 @ 8:29 PM CST
Another cheap attempt to cover up the truth!
Anonymous
posted 7/24/06 @ 12:45 PM CST
i dont believe in the chupacabra, but all the same, what IS to be gained by proving there is no such thing. whoop de doo, good for you
Post a Comment