|
Meet a presidential long-shot
On one hand we have Ron Paul: A little-known, unorthodox, irreverent proponent of peace, individual freedoms and federal frugality. On the other we have every other White House wannabe.
By Patrick Brendel
Dr. Ron Paul's druthers lie on sheets of cellulose amid an atmosphere of argon and helium, inside seven separate metal-and-glass encasements at the National Archives in Washington, D.C.
These so-called charters of freedom - the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights - have guided the U.S. representative throughout his 31-year political career and now into a second bid for the presidency. Paul served as a U.S. representative briefly in 1976, and again from 1978 to 1984. In 1984, Paul lost a primary bid for the U.S. Senate to Phil Gramm of College Station. In 1988, Paul ran as a libertarian for the U.S. presidency, finishing third in the popular vote (0.5 percent) behind George Bush and Michael Dukakis. In 1996, Paul beat incumbent democrat Greg Laughlin for U.S. representative, the office he currently holds. In January, Paul formed an exploratory committee to look into running for president in 2008. He garnered about 430,000 votes as a Libertarian in 1988, but probably won't get that many in the Republican primary. But let's pretend Paul shocks the free world, wins the nomination in September and beats the Democrats in November (which wouldn't be impossible given a Clinton/Obama ticket). Bam! Paul is president. He has his druthers, and he would follow them: President Paul would end the War in Iraq, stop the War on Drugs and save us taxpayers money. As commander in chief, he would bring the troops home, rather than sending them out all over the world. "Since World War II, we haven't declared war," Paul said in an October interview, conducted by phone while he waited at a dentist's office in Lake Jackson, Texas. "And since then, we haven't won a war." Paul said many people have exaggerated the threat posed by a nuclear North Korea or Iran, just as people formerly hyperbolized the threat posed by a nuclear Pakistan. Using executive orders and the power to appoint judges and agency heads, Paul would end the federal War on Drugs. The Texan strives to present all information fairly, accurately and completely.
If we have made an error, let us know about it here, or email managingeditor@dailytexanonline.com. |



Be sure to include your name, major, and classification. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.
By clicking Post, you give The Daily Texan the right to publish your comments in any form, including online and in print in The Firing Line. Please limit your comments to 300 words. The Daily Texan reserves the right to edit all comments for brevity, clarity and liability.
You may also send Firing Lines to the editor at firingline@dailytexanonline.com
Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 13
nick
posted 2/09/07 @ 2:26 PM CST
I agree with you 100% that no candidate is ever perfect, but the deficiencies that you list show your lack of understanding in these areas. One thing that Ron Paul constantly talks about on the floor of congress is the importance of bringing back the gold standard, and getting rid of the federal reserve bank. (Continued…)
James Babb
posted 2/09/07 @ 6:22 PM CST
Dr. Paul has my vote!
Lex
posted 2/09/07 @ 6:42 PM CST
Dr. Paul is a lot better known nationally than people think. The mainstream media ignores him, but he is a hero on the Internet to libertarians, Constitutionalists, small-government Republicans, and anti-war liberals. (Continued…)
Dan
posted 2/09/07 @ 9:39 PM CST
If he runs, I will actually cast a vote for a change. I'll vote for Ron Paul.
John
posted 2/10/07 @ 6:58 AM CST
It gives me goosebumps to think that there is a possibility that the US could have a president who actually obeys the Constitution.
Jacquelyn Barnette
posted 2/10/07 @ 10:31 AM CST
This is the man, if elected President, would bring a day of reckoning. He would restore the law of the land. He has my vote.
Flo Hoffman
posted 2/11/07 @ 6:44 PM CST
Ron Paul........President Ron Paul 2008
He can win! He has more support than anyone realizes across all party lines.
He has our votes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Allan Juranek
posted 2/13/07 @ 10:26 AM CST
Ron Paul is our only hope; everyone else only promises their version of 'more of the same.' Paul is mainstream enough to win, but maverick enough to actually do some good. (Continued…)
Randy
posted 2/14/07 @ 8:21 AM CST
Ron Paul could and would restore the U.S. to the most prosperous and honorable country in the world again. He's got my vote!
Shelly Comerford
posted 2/15/07 @ 10:11 AM CST
Ron Paul would be the best thing that could happen to our country. He knows the Constitution and the history of our country better than 98% of our so-called representatives in Washington. (Continued…)
Post a Comment