College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

It’s time for UT to scrap UIL

By Joshua Avelar

Daily Texan Staff

|

Published: Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Times are tough at UT as financial troubles are rearing their ugly heads all over campus.

This newspaper has been ridden with headlines detailing budget cuts and program scraps for the past year or so, and just a quick browse of other college newspapers across the country shows this phenomenon is not unique to the 40 Acres.

One unique thing about UT’s budget constraints is the University’s responsibility to oversee the state’s high school athletic and academic competitions. But in the spirit of necessary cutbacks, the time has come for UT to scrap the University Interscholastic League from its list of responsibilities. 

UT founded the league, known as UIL, in 1909, when UT was just one of a handful of public universities in a far-less-populated state. At the time, it made sense for UT to invest in regulating these competitions to attract and recruit students.

According to the Texas Education Agency, there are more than 1.3 million high school students in the state. Just a fraction of these students will end up attending UT, and even fewer will end up playing for the Longhorns.

UT is running out of space for its incoming freshman classes every year, as evidenced by the recent decision to cap automatic admission to just students who finished in the top 8 percent of their high school classes.

Furthermore, UIL is a budget constraint for UT. The league’s financial report for the 2008-09 school year states that it received about $10.9 million in revenue. But UIL’s overall expenses totaled over $12.5 million, leaving a $1.6 million deficit.

That money could possibly go to scholarships, a more efficient way to recruit good students than running high school competitions.

UIL is currently under the governance of the vice president of diversity and community engagement. Yet there exists no sign that regulating UIL necessarily adds to UT’s diversity or further engages the University with the community.

High school basketball players may think it’s cool to play on the Frank Erwin Center’s court for the state championship, but many of these students have played on NBA courts before: Playing on the Horns’ home floor loses its luster pretty quickly after that. Actually, it would be quite a shock if many of the participants in UIL competitions were even aware that UT was in charge of this entity.

If UIL were eliminated from UT’s budget, many Texans would undoubtedly go into a state of panic. Disturbing the state of high school sports in Texas by moving so drastically as to dissolve UIL would certainly raise some eyebrows.

But high school sports — most notably football — border on religion in Texas, and the school communities would find some way to organize and regulate their own nonprofit governing body.

Come hell, high water or budget cuts, high school sports will live on in Texas.

Texas is often thrown into a popular competition with California and Florida over which state produces the greatest athletes. Texas has the only high school interscholastic competition agency run by a university.

If California and Florida’s high school sports can exist without the governance of a local university, so can Texas’. High school sports do not need UT’s oversight and money to flourish.

Some sacrifices may arise from the scrapping of UIL, but it is a necessary move. After spending more than a century running this entity, UT has done its part in providing the state a governing body for high school sports. Whatever new agency that would arise after this move would have a great predecessor off of which to base its operations.

It may be unfortunate to see 101 years of tradition slip away in the name of finance, but UT has already set a precedent that tradition is no excuse to stop a good ol‘ program-scrapping.

If the University is serious about saving money and not wasting precious funds on operations irrelevant to its core mission, UIL should definitely move to the front of the chopping-block line.

Avelar is a government senior.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

22 comments

Disposable High School Student
Sun Mar 7 2010 13:31
Good luck with that. Not only will the sports fans rebel, but you'll have loads of angry theater kids on your hands. And let me tell you, there is little scarier than us angry theater kids.
This will go right over your heads since it has nothing to do with UIL
Wed Feb 10 2010 09:50
Forest? What forest? What the hell's a forest? All I see in front of me are a bunch of trees that need cutting down. . .
Anonymous
Wed Feb 10 2010 09:42
UIL is part of why I was able to figure out what I wanted to do here, why I wanted to come here, and with my life in general, via the academic competitions. I started out here on a scholarship from TILF, as well. To say that it's worth scrapping UIL as anything close to one of the first cuts is not only hasty, it is flat out stupid to even think of removing so many academic competitions from being available to high school students as anything but a last resort.

Especially going off of a single financial statement that doesn't even mention the cost to the university itself! How was this piece allowed to run, opinion or not? I realize people are bitter over the Cactus, but this is on an entirely different scale.

A.F.
Wed Feb 10 2010 09:24
I still can not wrap my head around how this opinion piece was allowed to run. This article reeks of Fox News-like "journalism" and should be discouraged by an organization that claims to pride itself on impartiality. This article shows that The Daily Texan (at the very least the opinion section) is far from unbiased and strictly anti-establishment. If the writer had done his homework he would see that the majority of UIL's funding is generated on it's own and little to no funding comes from UT. UIL is indeed an entity of the University of Texas, however, it is, for the most part, independently run and it's employers are the more than 1,000 school districts in Texas. Our writer argues that the phantom funding that UT provides to UIL could be better used towards scholarship; unfortunately, he seems to be unaware (or chooses to be unaware) of the Texas Interscholastic League Foundation that has awarded millions of dollars in scholarships to high school students who have competed in UIL academic activities. So much for the argument that UIL is strictly an athletic program. I am very saddened to see that the "Texan" staff is so upset over the possible closing of the Cactus Cafe that it allows one of it's writers to resort to creating "facts" to justify a moot argument. The Daily Texan is a legitimate journalistic outlet and it's staff would do well to remember that; hiding underneath the blanket of "opinion" does now award you the right to make up facts to back up your idea. You are no Glenn Beck sir!
David Hillis
Tue Feb 9 2010 22:49
I checked into this, and the UIL does not appear to run at a deficit. There was indeed a $1.6 million deficit that appeared for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, but that was largely covered by a surplus from the previous fiscal year. The explanation appears to be that the state provided funding for a two-year program of steroid testing of athletes in 07-08, but the testing was not completed until 08-09. So the budget was in surplus in 07-08 (when the money was transferred), and then deficit in 08-09 (when the testing was completed). Over the two years, it was close to even. So, although the budget picture of 08-09 appeared show deficit spending, that was a one-year artifact.
Name withheld
Tue Feb 9 2010 15:20
I have been sobbing uncontrollably for the last several hours thanks to this vicious attack piece maligning an institution so dear to my heart that I can scarcely find the words to give voice to my horror. I bet somewhere in this world there is something this thoughtless writer loves as well. I wonder how he would feel if I set out to attack whatever it was that was precious to him in this veil of tears that is our lives. I just wish that someone with gifts greater than my own would seize upon him and tear his arguments to shreds. I would not be the person I am today without having had the benefit of the UIL experience. Is nothing sacred? For shame!
Simon
Tue Feb 9 2010 15:06
How much revenue does the Division of Housing generate from UIL? How about the athletics department and other departments within the University hosting events? This has to be the most poorly written oped to hit the Texan in years. The Texan should demand higher standards from its writers and stop publishing recklessly written articles.
Ben Kenobi
Tue Feb 9 2010 14:54
[intervening] This little one's not worth the effort. Now come, let me get you something.
John
Tue Feb 9 2010 14:27
Not a very well thought out argument if you ask me. The writer has based his entire column on ONE fact from ONE expense report without even taking into account the context of those numbers or looking at past reports. I know it's an OpEd so you don't have to present the other side of the argument, but the writer has an EXTREME lack of facts. Cannot stress enough, ONE fact to support his argument in this whole piece. Maybe two if you count the part about Florida and California. Also, the UIL is not just sports. Lot of other programs would suffer if UT "scrapped" the UIL. The university is better for having the UIL.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 9 2010 14:21
Nice to know there are mind readers among us. Perhaps "For the Life of me" can provide an explanation of the intricacies involved in cancelling informal classes and closing the Cactus. Looks like Life's resentments are showing through. The irony is, Life truly believes this is ironic.
For the life of me, I just can't fathom what he's up to. . .
Tue Feb 9 2010 14:05
Okay, I'll try it again. Brace yourselves. For some of you, this may feel similar to licking a 9 volt battery. There's something, something "out there" let's say, called irony that writers sometimes employ to make their little "points." Irony is the use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning.

I wonder what the writer might have had in mind when he sat down to write this article? Was he trying to make some kind of point, maybe? Or does he, like, still harbor resentments against the dweebs in his high school debate team? Gosh, if only I had some critical reading skills, maybe I could begin to answer that question. . .

Luis
Tue Feb 9 2010 13:06
Perhaps if Mr. Avelar had competed in UIL Journalism contests or been a part of the ILPC he would have known that it is crucial to get the FACTS straight before offering solutions. His knowledge of the UIL and its many events outside of athletics needs remediation as does his apparent failure to research the UIL's funding sources. An apology or correction is warranted. Perhaps a feature story on the League's centennial would be appropriate.
Marilyn
Tue Feb 9 2010 12:57
The truth is UIL is completely funded by itself. The only reason it is under the University is because the Texas Legislature decided UIL shouldn't be a stand alone League. If the University cut ties with the UIL they would lose money, UIL pays to use the Erwin Center and every other building needed to run state meets. UIL holds the largest Debate Tournament in the state, the largest One Act Play Festival, and offers over 75 events. Without UIL there would be no extracurricular activities and no athletes. Most Universities want kids who competed in UIL events. The University is lucky to be a part of such an amazing legacy.
Karen
Tue Feb 9 2010 12:40
Texas high schools should encourage sports more to address rampant obesity. It is better for them to play football, basketball and tennis rather than sit at home and watch TV. UIL is a great program but the University need not sponsor it.
Alex
Tue Feb 9 2010 12:14
good point Kalloi I guess I should have made my statement more clear.....the topic on this article is about the UIL but the main focus seems aimed at the athletics section so my comment was just based on the athletics as well....but seeing as how the program as a whole is losing money it does make sense to at least explore other possible scenarios for that 12.5 million being spent every year.....like more scholarships more me so i dont have to work n e more!!!! lol :-)
No. 2
Tue Feb 9 2010 12:09
No. 4 ... The article says that UIL had a $1.6 million deficit. It does not say what the actual cost to the University is. The last time I checked, the two are not the same.
Kalloi k'Agathoi
Tue Feb 9 2010 12:02
I find it telling that Avelar and Alex think UIL is only involved in sports. A student who "has lived and grown up in Texas" should know better.
Alex
Tue Feb 9 2010 11:50
I wrote that last comment sry :)
Anonymous
Tue Feb 9 2010 11:49
I think that this is actually a pretty good idea, I mean coming from someone who has lived and grown up in Texas, its gonna take more than one cut program to stop this borderline cult that is Texas sports. And to be honest, I think a university should always put its students as its top prioirity and not worry so much about "poosible" future students, seeing as how these current students are the ones paying tuition. Personally, as someone who is working and not on scholarship, ill take every dollar they can give to me :-)......Oh yea and #2 (anonymous), if your going to comment on an article maybe you should do the important thing first which is to actually read it. The entire 7th paragrapgh talks about the UIL costs. Making ignorant statements like that just shows that you didnt take the time to read what the article actually had to say and it just ends up making you look like an idiot. Saying that he doesnt give the costs when they are in the damn paper is ludicrous lol.....
Jeff
Tue Feb 9 2010 10:33
I detect a Swiftian subtext at work here. If this proposal is not of the "modest" variety, the alternative amounts to. . . heresy! Pitchforks and torches, sports loving citizenry!






log out